Thomas Abraham wrote:
>
> Hi Grant,
>
> On 10 October 2011 04:40, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Thomas Abraham
> > <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Some of the gpio chips of exynos4 are assigned a default gpio config
without
> >> the exynos4 specific pull up/down callbacks which resulted in incorrect
> >> setting of pull up/down configuration.
> >>
> >> Fix this by adding two new exynos4 specific entries in the array of
default
> >> configs with set_pull and get_pull callbacks set to exynos4 specific
callbacks
> >> The new default gpio configs can then be used for exynos4 gpio chips.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Does this need to be merged as a bug fix for v3.1, or is it for v3.2?
> > Does it have any dependencies, or can it go in via the gpio/next tree?
>
>
> This patch is a bug fix for the new consolidated samsung gpio driver
> that will be merged in v3.2 via Kukjin's tree. The new consolidated
> samsung gpio driver is merged only in Kukjin's for-next and not
> available in gpio/next.
>
Hi Grant and Thomas,
Yes this should be applied to my tree and I don't know why this has been
missed when I worked on gpio/samsung. Sorry for noisy on gpio/samsung :(
Anyway, I will apply this for v3.2 and as a note, this commit has been
merged into mainline so you don't need to handle in gpio/next. commit id
0bf8fa04e80a562641f687547053f98670f25cf9("gpio/exynos4: Fix incorrect
mapping of gpio pull-up macro to register setting")
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
