Hello Mr Kukjin,
I checked this link
"http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg09770.html";
given by you,but this link has the patch only to extract the timeout
value from the
extended CSD register of the eMMC 4.5 device. Whereas if you review my patch
you can actually see the implementation of the timeout handling in the
mmc_switch
function in the mmc_ops.c
Sorry my previous mails were with ricj text enabled.
Thanks and regards
Girish K S
On 1 September 2011 09:20, Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi kukjin,
> but I cannot see its handling in the mmc_ops.c file which also updates the
> switch function.
> regards
> girish
>
> On Thursday, 1 September 2011, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Girish K S wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch adds the code to handle the default timeout
>>> for switch command.
>>> For eMMC 4.5 devices if timeout is not specified for the switch
>>> command while accessing a specific field,then the default timeout
>>> shall be used to timeout. Specification says there is no timeout
>>> defined while accessing BKOPS_START, SANITIZE_START, FLUSH_CACHE
>>> field(so these fields are excluded).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 5 +++++
>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 +
>>> include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 4 ++++
>>> 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> index 5700b1c..5b9fb6a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> @@ -405,6 +405,11 @@ static int mmc_read_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card,
>>> u8
>>> *ext_csd)
>>> if (card->ext_csd.rev >= 5)
>>> card->ext_csd.rel_param =
>>> ext_csd[EXT_CSD_WR_REL_PARAM];
>>>
>>> + if (card->ext_csd.rev > 5) {
>>> + /* (eMMC 4.5)timeout is expressed in units of 10 ms*/
>>> + card->ext_csd.cmd6_timeout =
>>> ext_csd[EXT_CSD_CMD6_TIME]*10;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_ERASED_MEM_CONT])
>>> card->erased_byte = 0xFF;
>>> else
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
>>> index 770c3d0..c4d82f4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
>>> @@ -394,6 +394,14 @@ int mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card, u8 set, u8
>> index,
>>> u8 value,
>>> cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1B | MMC_RSP_R1B | MMC_CMD_AC;
>>> cmd.cmd_timeout_ms = timeout_ms;
>>>
>>> + /* timeout is not defined for below command indexes (eMMC 4.5) */
>>> + if ((timeout_ms == 0) &&
>>> + (card->ext_csd->rev > 5) &&
>>> + (index != EXT_CSD_BKOPS_START) &&
>>> + (index != EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) &&
>>> + (index != EXT_CSD_FLUSH_CACHE))
>>> + cmd.cmd_timeout_ms = card->ext_csd->cmd6_timeout;
>>> +
>>> err = mmc_wait_for_cmd(card->host, &cmd, MMC_CMD_RETRIES);
>>> if (err)
>>> return err;
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>>> index b460fc2..ef88412 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct mmc_ext_csd {
>>> u8 rel_sectors;
>>> u8 rel_param;
>>> u8 part_config;
>>> + u8 cmd6_timeout; /* timeout in ms */
>>> unsigned int part_time; /* Units: ms */
>>> unsigned int sa_timeout; /* Units: 100ns */
>>> unsigned int hs_max_dtr;
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
>>> index 5a794cb..a23f836 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.hHi Girish,
>>
>> (Cc'ed Seungwon Jeon)
>>
>> As I know, Seungwon Jeon has been submitted same/similar patch before
>> this.
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg09770.html
>>
>> Chris,
>> I cannot find your review on that...
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kgene.
>> --
>> Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer,
>> SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
