Am Sonntag 21 August 2011, 22:26:16 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> On Sunday, August 21, 2011 07:25:04 PM Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Sonntag 21 August 2011, 19:13:32 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
> > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 06:01:29PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > > +/* i2s-ref
> > > > + *
> > > > + * i2s bus reference clock, selectable from external, esysclk or
> > > > epllref + *
> > > > + * Note, this used to be two clocks, but was compressed into one.
> > > > +*/
> > > > +
> > > > +struct clk *clk_i2s_srclist[] = {
> > > > + [0] = &clk_i2s_eplldiv.clk,
> > > > + [1] = &clk_i2s_ext,
> > > > + [2] = &clk_epllref.clk,
> > > > + [3] = &clk_epllref.clk,
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > Is there any reason not to make this static (have you run your patch
> > > through checkpatch.pl ?)
> >
> > Yep I did run all of them through checkpatch (after beeing scolded last
> > time) and it didn't report anything.
> >
> > But for this move of code I simply grabbed the code fragments and put
> > them into their new location (i.e. it was this way in
> > mach-s3c2443/clock.c) and should have probably taken a closer look at
> > what I'm moving.
> >
> > So it seems you are right, it should probably be static as everything
> > else is also static.
>
> And you don't really understand why everything else is static, right ? ;-)
yep :-) - until now
But a quick lookup did help [lifetime of the variable extends across the
entire run of the program, i.e. a global variable and local to the source file
it's defined in].
> (don't take it as an offense)
none taken ... in fact it was a welcome push to reread variable storage
classes and lifetime again [last time was some years ago] :-).
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
