Am Sonntag 21 August 2011, 19:13:32 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 06:01:29PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > +/* i2s-ref
> > + *
> > + * i2s bus reference clock, selectable from external, esysclk or epllref
> > + *
> > + * Note, this used to be two clocks, but was compressed into one.
> > +*/
> > +
> > +struct clk *clk_i2s_srclist[] = {
> > + [0] = &clk_i2s_eplldiv.clk,
> > + [1] = &clk_i2s_ext,
> > + [2] = &clk_epllref.clk,
> > + [3] = &clk_epllref.clk,
> > +};
>
> Is there any reason not to make this static (have you run your patch
> through checkpatch.pl ?)
Yep I did run all of them through checkpatch (after beeing scolded last time)
and it didn't report anything.
But for this move of code I simply grabbed the code fragments and put them
into their new location (i.e. it was this way in mach-s3c2443/clock.c) and
should have probably taken a closer look at what I'm moving.
So it seems you are right, it should probably be static as everything else is
also static.
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
