On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 21:51 +0900, Boojin Kim wrote:
> Vinod Koul Wrote:
> > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 7:27 PM
> > To: Boojin Kim
> > Cc: vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kukjin Kim; Jassi Brar; Grant Likely;
> > Mark Brown; Dan Williams
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 03/14] DMA: PL330: Support DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG
> > command
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 10:28 +0900, Boojin Kim wrote:
> > > This patch adds support DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG command.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Boojin Kim <boojin.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > ---------
> > > 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
> > > index 586ab39..880f010 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
> > > @@ -256,25 +256,50 @@ static int pl330_alloc_chan_resources(struct
> > dma_chan *chan)
> > > static int pl330_control(struct dma_chan *chan, enum dma_ctrl_cmd
> > cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > > {
> > > struct dma_pl330_chan *pch = to_pchan(chan);
> > > - struct dma_pl330_desc *desc;
> > > + struct dma_pl330_desc *desc, *_dt;
> > > unsigned long flags;
> > > + struct dma_pl330_dmac *pdmac = pch->dmac;
> > > + struct dma_slave_config *slave_config;
> > > + struct dma_pl330_peri *peri;
> > > + LIST_HEAD(list);
> > >
> > > - /* Only supports DMA_TERMINATE_ALL */
> > > - if (cmd != DMA_TERMINATE_ALL)
> > > - return -ENXIO;
> > > -
> > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&pch->lock, flags);
> > > -
> > > - /* FLUSH the PL330 Channel thread */
> > > - pl330_chan_ctrl(pch->pl330_chid, PL330_OP_FLUSH);
> > > + switch (cmd) {
> > > + case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL:
> > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pch->lock, flags);
> > >
> > > - /* Mark all desc done */
> > > - list_for_each_entry(desc, &pch->work_list, node)
> > > - desc->status = DONE;
> > > + /* FLUSH the PL330 Channel thread */
> > > + pl330_chan_ctrl(pch->pl330_chid, PL330_OP_FLUSH);
> > >
> > > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pch->lock, flags);
> > > + /* Mark all desc done */
> > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(desc, _dt, &pch->work_list , node)
> > {
> > > + desc->status = DONE;
> > > + pch->completed = desc->txd.cookie;
> > > + list_move_tail(&desc->node, &list);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > - pl330_tasklet((unsigned long) pch);
> > > + list_splice_tail_init(&list, &pdmac->desc_pool);
> > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pch->lock, flags);
> > > + break;
> > > + case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG:
> > > + slave_config = (struct dma_slave_config *)arg;
> > > + peri = pch->chan.private;
> > > +
> > > + if (slave_config->direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
> > > + if (slave_config->dst_addr)
> > > + peri->fifo_addr = slave_config->dst_addr;
> > > + if (slave_config->dst_addr_width)
> > > + peri->burst_sz = __ffs(slave_config-
> > >dst_addr_width);
> > This doesn't sound right, why can't you use xxx_maxburst field instead?
> Can you explain the problem in more detail?
> Do you mean that 'xxx_maxburst' takes place of 'xxx_addr_width' or __ffs()
> isn't proper here?
>
> Additionally, I will modify this code to consider '_maxburst' field.
__ffs is okay and sensible.
I meant you should use proper fields for passing info, which in this
case would be dst_maxburst for specifying destination burst sizes
--
~Vinod Koul
Intel Corp.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
