On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 10:52:26AM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Seungwhan Youn <claude.youn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Now, I'm almost finished 2nd patch for submit except this audio clock > > setting. For now, I can only think that remove audio clock setting > > from this machine code, and add audio clock settings in arch later(may > > be after arch/arm/plat-samsung get EPLL policy as Mr. Kukjin said). > > Is this okay? > IMO neither of the method is much better than the other. > If neither of the maintainers relent, maybe drop the clock setting altogether > and mark the machine driver 'BROKEN' until the EPLL management is fixed? I'm OK with having the code in the driver, I just want something there that makes it more discoverable that it's there like a config option. Having the driver log loudly when it reconfigures the EPLL would probably also cover it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |