On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > MyungJoo Ham wrote: >> >> CPUFREQ of S5PV210 uses different APLL settings and we provide >> such values for CPUFREQ at pll.h. We have been using differently >> between EVT0 and EVT1 machines. Although this version of kernel >> assumes that the CPU is EVT1, users may use code for EVT0 later. >> >> Note that at 1GHz of ARMCLK, APLL should be 1GHz and for other lower >> ARMCLK, APLL should be 800MHz. >> >> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h > b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h >> index 7db3227..3112aba 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s5p/include/plat/pll.h >> @@ -21,6 +21,14 @@ >> >> #include <asm/div64.h> >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5PC110_EVT0_ERRATA > > Actually, EVT0 is not real chip and not for mass production. > So don't use in here. That was my point in a thread few days ago when I suggested we be careful while pushing code upstream. Rather than flood mainline Samsung support with any hardware we can get our hands on, we need to strategically select SoCs (& their versions) and machines so that we have maximum overlap of features and, equally important, _users_ of that code. That will help us concentrate our efforts on support needed by most of the users and devices. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |