Hello, On Thursday, May 13, 2010 12:02 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: > Ben Dooks wrote: > > > > I would like to get an idea of what each group involvedi n the > > current S5PC100 changes is planning to allow the organisation of > > what is going on. > > > > Firstly, I think Kukjin's clock changes are the first to be > > applied, followed by looking at what support exists (or is being > > submitted) in plat-s5p which could be used for s5pc100. > > > > Then, let's move out what is left of plat-s5pc1xx into mach-s5pc100 > > and get rid of it (although the final removal may have to be left > > until the next merge window, due to time constraints). > > > > I would like to see whatever changes done grouped into sections, > > such as clock, machine, core, gpio. > > I will re-submit S5PC100 clock patch which can be merged to Ben's latest > tree > without any compile error. > > Marek, can you re-make your patches based on it? Yes, I will do this soon. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski Samsung Poland R&D Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |