Ben Dooks wrote: > > I would like to get an idea of what each group involvedi n the > current S5PC100 changes is planning to allow the organisation of > what is going on. > > Firstly, I think Kukjin's clock changes are the first to be > applied, followed by looking at what support exists (or is being > submitted) in plat-s5p which could be used for s5pc100. > > Then, let's move out what is left of plat-s5pc1xx into mach-s5pc100 > and get rid of it (although the final removal may have to be left > until the next merge window, due to time constraints). > > I would like to see whatever changes done grouped into sections, > such as clock, machine, core, gpio. I will re-submit S5PC100 clock patch which can be merged to Ben's latest tree without any compile error. Marek, can you re-make your patches based on it? Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |