On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:15:28PM +0900, jassi brar wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:57:53PM +0900, jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> From: Jassi Brar <jassi.brar@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> GPIO_E-[5,9] pin functionality was defined incorrectly. >> >> The patch corrects and adds missing pins. >> > >> > Ok, should I apply this to the fixes tree and send to linus? >> Honestly speaking, I don't know. Please do as you see due. >> Maybe Mark Brown, as an affected maintainer, has some opinion? > > Might've wanted to CC me there... :) If they're just plain wrong then > it should probably go to Linus, though equally well nobody's been > complaining about it. yes, I missed to cc u on the first patch by mistake. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |