On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:15:28PM +0900, jassi brar wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:57:53PM +0900, jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Jassi Brar <jassi.brar@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> GPIO_E-[5,9] pin functionality was defined incorrectly. > >> The patch corrects and adds missing pins. > > > > Ok, should I apply this to the fixes tree and send to linus? > Honestly speaking, I don't know. Please do as you see due. > Maybe Mark Brown, as an affected maintainer, has some opinion? Might've wanted to CC me there... :) If they're just plain wrong then it should probably go to Linus, though equally well nobody's been complaining about it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |