On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:33:06 +0200
Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/25/24 4:34 PM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:50:18 +0000
> > Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> In contrast to the other functions in cpu.S it's quite lengthy so
> >> let's split it off.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> s390x/Makefile | 2 +-
> >> s390x/{cpu.S => cpu-sie.S} | 59 +----------------------------------
> >> s390x/cpu.S | 64 --------------------------------------
> >> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
> >> copy s390x/{cpu.S => cpu-sie.S} (56%)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> diff --git a/s390x/cpu.S b/s390x/cpu-sie.S
> >> similarity index 56%
> >> copy from s390x/cpu.S
> >> copy to s390x/cpu-sie.S
> >> index 9155b044..9370b5c0 100644
> >> --- a/s390x/cpu.S
> >> +++ b/s390x/cpu-sie.S
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> >> /*
> >> - * s390x assembly library
> >> + * s390x SIE assembly library
> >> *
> >> * Copyright (c) 2019 IBM Corp.
> >> *
> >
> > Should we not also update the Copyright here? At least to
> > "Copyright (c) 2019, 2024 IBM Corp."?
> >
>
> Why?
> Did I add something important to this file?
> I'm effectively moving code around.
>
That is how interpreted the copyright rules so far. But I might
absolutely be wrong about that when only moving existing code.
I do agree that this change is only moving the code to a new file.
I would leave this decision up to you.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
