On 12/15/23 13:36, Joe Lawrence wrote:
On 12/11/23 16:53, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 12/6/23 07:39, Miroslav Benes wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 12/5/23 05:52, mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:38 +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
0003-selftests-livepatch-Test-livepatching-a-heavily-call.patch has
style problems, please review.
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
I couldn't find any mention about "missing module name". Is your script
showing more warnings than these ones? Can you please share your
output?
I'll fix MAINTAINERS file but I'll wait until I understand what's
missing in your checkpatch script to resend the patchset.
Looks like it is coming a script - still my question stands on
whether or not you would need a module name for this module?
I admit I am also clueless here. The module name is given in Makefile. In
this case in test_modules/Makefile. I do not know of anything else. There
is no MODULE_NAME macro. Could you elaborate, please?
I see that now.
Hi Shuah,
In the other replies to this thread, Marcos noted that he would add some
text to the commit / documentation on running and building the selftests
directly in the kernel tree (that would get my Ack) ... is there
anything else to be updated for a hopefully final v4 (for your Ack)?
I am waiting for v4 with your comments are addressed. I can take
this through kselftest tree.
thanks,
-- Shuah
