On 6/5/23 12:35, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 09:42:48 +0200
Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
Hrm, since I already made the mistake of introducing bitfields with and
without spaces between the ":" I'm in no position to complain here.
I'm also not sure what the consensus is.
tbh I don't really have an opinion, I don't mind either, to the point
that I don't even care if we mix them
+ };
+ };
uint64_t addr;
};
I've come to like static asserts for huge structs and bitfields since
they can safe you from a *lot* of headaches.
you mean statically asserting that the size is what it should be?
in that case fully agree
Yes, asserting the size.
