On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 09:42:48 +0200 Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > Hrm, since I already made the mistake of introducing bitfields with and > without spaces between the ":" I'm in no position to complain here. > > I'm also not sure what the consensus is. tbh I don't really have an opinion, I don't mind either, to the point that I don't even care if we mix them > > > + }; > > + }; > > uint64_t addr; > > }; > > I've come to like static asserts for huge structs and bitfields since > they can safe you from a *lot* of headaches. you mean statically asserting that the size is what it should be? in that case fully agree [...]
