Re: [PATCH 4/14] audit: avoid missing-prototype warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:51 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023, at 16:33, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On May 17, 2023 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > We probably should move the audit_serial() and auditsc_get_stamp()
> > away from the watch/mark/tree functions, but that isn't your problem.
> >
> > Anyway, this looks okay to me; do you have a problem if I merge this
> > via the audit/next branch or were you hoping to have this go in
> > through a different tree?
>
> Merging it through your tree is probably best, Andrew can either
> pick the ones that nobody else took, or I can resend the rest.

Easy enough, merged to audit/next, thanks.

-- 
paul-moore.com




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux