On Wed, May 17, 2023, at 16:33, Paul Moore wrote:
> On May 17, 2023 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We probably should move the audit_serial() and auditsc_get_stamp()
> away from the watch/mark/tree functions, but that isn't your problem.
>
> Anyway, this looks okay to me; do you have a problem if I merge this
> via the audit/next branch or were you hoping to have this go in
> through a different tree?
Merging it through your tree is probably best, Andrew can either
pick the ones that nobody else took, or I can resend the rest.
Arnd
