Re: [PATCH] s390/ipl: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool() (second step)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 04:08:22PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
> However, the latter is more used within the kernel.
> 
> In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
> the other function name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch is similar to the serie ([1]) that tries to axed all usages
> of strtobool().
> Most of the patches have been merged in -next.
> 
> Commit d9b25bdf57e4 ("s390/ipl: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()")
> already fixed this file, but a new usage has been introduce by commit
> 87fd22e0ae92 ("s390/ipl: add eckd support").
> 
> This patch has been cross-compiled with make.cross.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied, thanks!



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux