[PATCH] s390/ipl: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool() (second step)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool().
However, the latter is more used within the kernel.

In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to
the other function name.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
This patch is similar to the serie ([1]) that tries to axed all usages
of strtobool().
Most of the patches have been merged in -next.

Commit d9b25bdf57e4 ("s390/ipl: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()")
already fixed this file, but a new usage has been introduce by commit
87fd22e0ae92 ("s390/ipl: add eckd support").

This patch has been cross-compiled with make.cross.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1667336095.git.christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/
---
 arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
index fbd646dbf440..5547223acce0 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
@@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ static ssize_t reipl_eckd_clear_store(struct kobject *kobj,
 				      struct kobj_attribute *attr,
 				      const char *buf, size_t len)
 {
-	if (strtobool(buf, &reipl_eckd_clear) < 0)
+	if (kstrtobool(buf, &reipl_eckd_clear) < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	return len;
 }
-- 
2.34.1




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux