Re: [PATCH] s390/mm: Use pmd_pgtable_page() helper in __gmap_segment_gaddr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 01:13:45PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >>>> index e9e387caffac..5ead9e997510 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> >>>> @@ -2403,7 +2403,7 @@ static inline void pgtable_pte_page_dtor(struct page *page)
> >>>>  
> >>>>  #if USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS
> >>>>  
> >>>> -static struct page *pmd_pgtable_page(pmd_t *pmd)
> >>>> +static inline struct page *pmd_pgtable_page(pmd_t *pmd)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>  	unsigned long mask = ~(PTRS_PER_PMD * sizeof(pmd_t) - 1);
> >>>>  	return virt_to_page((void *)((unsigned long) pmd & mask));
> >>>
> >>> This chunk does not appear to belong to this patch.
> >>
> >> Should not this helper be made a 'static inline' before using it else where ?
> > 
> > Probably yes, but it is not kvm s390-specific change.
> 
> Right, just that the s390 change here is the first instance where this helper
> is being used outside the header, hence kept them together.
> 
> > 
> > I guess, you wanted to make it together or as a follow-up to this one?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221124131641.1523772-1-anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx/
> > 
> Unless too much trouble, could we just keep it here as proposed.

For s390 part:

Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux