On 27.09.22 02:33, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:42:38 +0100 Jules Irenge wrote: >> Coccinnelle reports a warning >> Warning: Use scnprintf or sprintf >> Adding to that, there has been a slow migration from snprintf to scnprintf. >> This LWN article explains the rationale for this change >> https: //lwn.net/Articles/69419/ >> Ie. snprintf() returns what *would* be the resulting length, >> while scnprintf() returns the actual length. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@xxxxxxxxx> > > Looks legit but please repost this separately. > We only see patch 3 of the series. When you repost, you can add Reviewed-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thank you Alexandra
