On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:42:38 +0100 Jules Irenge wrote: > Coccinnelle reports a warning > Warning: Use scnprintf or sprintf > Adding to that, there has been a slow migration from snprintf to scnprintf. > This LWN article explains the rationale for this change > https: //lwn.net/Articles/69419/ > Ie. snprintf() returns what *would* be the resulting length, > while scnprintf() returns the actual length. > > Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@xxxxxxxxx> Looks legit but please repost this separately. We only see patch 3 of the series.
