On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:26 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
[...]
> >
>
> I simply did the following and got much better results.
>
> But I am not sure if updates to ->usage are really needed that often...
I suspect we need to improve the per-cpu memcg stock usage here. Were
the updates mostly from uncharge path or charge path or that's
irrelevant?
I think doing full drain (i.e. drain_stock()) within __refill_stock()
when the local cache is larger than MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH is not best.
Rather we should always keep at least MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH for such
scenarios.
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page_counter.h b/include/linux/page_counter.h
> index 679591301994d316062f92b275efa2459a8349c9..e267be4ba849760117d9fd041e22c2a44658ab36
> 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page_counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page_counter.h
> @@ -3,12 +3,15 @@
> #define _LINUX_PAGE_COUNTER_H
>
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/cache.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
>
> struct page_counter {
> - atomic_long_t usage;
> - unsigned long min;
> + /* contended cache line. */
> + atomic_long_t usage ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> +
> + unsigned long min ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
Do we need to align 'min' too?
> unsigned long low;
> unsigned long high;
> unsigned long max;
> @@ -27,12 +30,6 @@ struct page_counter {
> unsigned long watermark;
> unsigned long failcnt;
>
> - /*
> - * 'parent' is placed here to be far from 'usage' to reduce
> - * cache false sharing, as 'usage' is written mostly while
> - * parent is frequently read for cgroup's hierarchical
> - * counting nature.
> - */
> struct page_counter *parent;
> };
>
>
>
