On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:44:07 -0600 Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 21:04:34 -0300 > Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 12:55:13PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > The use of 'extern' in function prototypes has been disrecommended in > > > the kernel coding style for several years now, remove them from all vfio > > > related files so contributors no longer need to decide between style and > > > consistency. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > A patch in the same vein was proposed about a year ago, but tied to an ill > > > fated series and forgotten. Now that we're at the beginning of a new > > > development cycle, I'd like to propose kicking off the v5.20 vfio next > > > branch with this patch and would kindly ask anyone with pending respins or > > > significant conflicts to rebase on top of this patch. Thanks! > > > > Can you stick it in your branch please? > > Thanks for the R-b, it was my plan today to put it in my next branch, > but I can't currently test vfio on mainline due to: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/165490039431.944052.12458624139225785964.stgit@omen/ > > I'll get this in once there's a mainline base where vfio still works. Thanks, This has now been resolved in rc4 via 034e5afad921 ("mm: re-allow pinning of zero pfns"). I've rebased to rc4 and pushed this patch out to the vfio next branch. Thanks, Alex
