Re: [PATCH v7 10/17] KVM: s390: pv: add mmu_notifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/4/22 16:53, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
Add an mmu_notifier for protected VMs. The callback function is
triggered when the mm is torn down, and will attempt to convert all
protected vCPUs to non-protected. This allows the mm teardown to use
the destroy page UVC instead of export.

Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
  arch/s390/kvm/pv.c               | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index a22c9266ea05..1bccb8561ba9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
  #include <linux/kvm.h>
  #include <linux/seqlock.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
  #include <asm/debug.h>
  #include <asm/cpu.h>
  #include <asm/fpu/api.h>
@@ -921,6 +922,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_pv {
  	u64 guest_len;
  	unsigned long stor_base;
  	void *stor_var;
+	struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
  };
struct kvm_arch{
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
index f1e812a45acb..d3b8fd9b5b3e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
@@ -193,6 +193,21 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
  	return -EIO;
  }
+static void kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
+					     struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	struct kvm *kvm = container_of(subscription, struct kvm, arch.pv.mmu_notifier);

Are we sure that the kvm pointer is still valid at this point?

+	u16 dummy;
+
+	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);

Against what are we locking here?

+	kvm_s390_cpus_from_pv(kvm, &dummy, &dummy);

I'd guess that we can't really have a second kvm_s390_cpus_from_pv() call in flight, right? If the mm is being torn down there would be no code left that can execute the IOCTL.

+	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+}
+
+static const struct mmu_notifier_ops kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops = {
+	.release = kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_release,
+};
+
  int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
  {
  	struct uv_cb_cgc uvcb = {
@@ -234,6 +249,11 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
  		return -EIO;
  	}
  	kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle = uvcb.guest_handle;
+	/* Add the notifier only once. No races because we hold kvm->lock */
+	if (kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier.ops != &kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops) {
+		kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier.ops = &kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops;
+		mmu_notifier_register(&kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier, kvm->mm);
+	}
  	return 0;
  }




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux