On 2/4/22 16:53, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
Refactor kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm to improve readability and simplify the improvements that are coming in subsequent patches. No functional change intended. [note: this can potentially be squashed into the next patch, I factored it out to simplify the review process]
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c index d3b8fd9b5b3e..4e4728ec83a7 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c @@ -180,17 +180,17 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc) cc = uv_cmd_nodata(kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm), UVC_CMD_DESTROY_SEC_CONF, rc, rrc); WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle, 0); - if (!cc) - atomic_dec(&kvm->mm->context.protected_count); - KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT DESTROY VM: rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc); - WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy vm failed rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc); - /* Intended memory leak on "impossible" error */ if (!cc) { + atomic_dec(&kvm->mm->context.protected_count); kvm_s390_pv_dealloc_vm(kvm); - return 0; + } else { + /* Intended memory leak on "impossible" error */ + s390_replace_asce(kvm->arch.gmap); } - s390_replace_asce(kvm->arch.gmap); - return -EIO; + KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT DESTROY VM: rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc); + WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy vm failed rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc); + + return cc ? -EIO : 0; }static void kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
