Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:31:06 +0200
Cc: freude@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx, mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx, kwankhede@xxxxxxxxxx, fiuczy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <cf889ee5-ae5c-4752-507b-a31a4c42e1c8@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20200605214004.14270-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <cf889ee5-ae5c-4752-507b-a31a4c42e1c8@linux.ibm.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0

On 16.06.20 16:26, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> I would greatly appreciate some attention to this patch series ... Please?

Any idea about the kernel test build mails? Are these patches maybe against
a wrong tree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
  - From: Tony Krowiak

References:
- [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
  - From: Tony Krowiak
- Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
  - From: Tony Krowiak

Prev by Date: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 01/12] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 19/25] mm/s390: Use mm_fault_accounting()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Info] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Linux Media] [Device Mapper]