On 19.02.20 20:46, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > I could add a comment to all other users of kvm_s390_vcpu_start/stop like > > > /* > * no need to check the return value of vcpu_stop as it can only have > * an error for protvirt, but protvirt means user cpu state > */ > if (!kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(vcpu->kvm)) > kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(vcpu); > > > to make clear why we do not check the return everywhere > Makes sense! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
