Re: [PATCH v2 31/42] KVM: s390: protvirt: Report CPU state to Ultravisor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I could add a comment to all other users of kvm_s390_vcpu_start/stop like


        /*
         * no need to check the return value of vcpu_stop as it can only have
         * an error for protvirt, but protvirt means user cpu state
         */
        if (!kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(vcpu->kvm))
                kvm_s390_vcpu_stop(vcpu);


to make clear why we do not check the return everywhere




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux