Re: [PATCH 28/35] KVM: s390: protvirt: UV calls diag308 0, 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/02/2020 12.39, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diag 308 subcode 0 and 1 require KVM and Ultravisor interaction, since
> the cpus have to be set into multiple reset states.
> 
> * All cpus need to be stopped
> * The "unshare all" UVC needs to be executed
> * The "perform reset" UVC needs to be executed
> * The cpus need to be reset via the "set cpu state" UVC
> * The issuing cpu needs to set state 5 via "set cpu state"

Is the patch description still accurate here? The patch seems mostly
about adding two new UVCs, and not really about diag 308 ... ?

> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx: patch merging, splitting, fixing]
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c b/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
> index 3fb54ec2cf3e..390830385b9f 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/diag.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>  #include <asm/gmap.h>
>  #include <asm/virtio-ccw.h>
> +#include <asm/uv.h>
>  #include "kvm-s390.h"
>  #include "trace.h"
>  #include "trace-s390.h"

This single change to diag.c looks like it could either be removed, or
the hunk should belong to another patch.

> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 4afa44e3d1ed..0be18ac1afb5 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c

 Thomas




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux