On 29.11.19 15:39, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 29.11.19 15:38, Janosch Frank wrote: > [...] >>>>> As we now have two interfaces to achieve the same thing (initial reset), >>>>> I do wonder if we should simply introduce >>>>> >>>>> KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET >>>>> KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET >>>>> >>>>> instead ... >>>>> >>>>> Then you can do KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET for the bugfix and >>>>> KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET later for PV. >>>>> >>>>> Does anything speak against that? >>>> >>>> Apart from loosing one more ioctl number probably not >>> >>> Do we care? (I think not, but maybe I am missing something :) ) >>> >> >> I don't, maybe somebody else does >> Btw. I'm struggling to find a good name for the capability: >> KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_ADDITIONAL_RESETS ? > > KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS ? Either that or two separate ones if you're not going to introduce them at the same time ... -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
