On 29.11.19 15:38, Janosch Frank wrote: [...] >>>> As we now have two interfaces to achieve the same thing (initial reset), >>>> I do wonder if we should simply introduce >>>> >>>> KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET >>>> KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET >>>> >>>> instead ... >>>> >>>> Then you can do KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET for the bugfix and >>>> KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET later for PV. >>>> >>>> Does anything speak against that? >>> >>> Apart from loosing one more ioctl number probably not >> >> Do we care? (I think not, but maybe I am missing something :) ) >> > > I don't, maybe somebody else does > Btw. I'm struggling to find a good name for the capability: > KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_ADDITIONAL_RESETS ? KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS ?
