Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/9] s390x: Define the PSW bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> Am 28.11.2019 um 20:16 schrieb Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> 
>> On 2019-11-28 15:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 28.11.19 13:46, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> Let's define the PSW bits  explicitly, it will clarify their
>>> usage.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  lib/s390x/asm/arch_bits.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h  |  6 ++----
>> I'm sorry, but I don't really see a reason to move these 4/5 defines to
>> a separate header. Can you just keep them in arch_def.h and extend?
> 
> no because arch_def.h contains C structures and inline.

(resend because the iOS Mail app does crazy html thingies)

You‘re looking for

#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
...

See lib/s390x/asm/sigp.h





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux