On 02/08/19 15:39, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 31.07.19 17:15, Thomas Huth wrote: >> Implement the ucall() interface on s390x to be able to use the >> dirty_log_test KVM selftest on s390x, too. >> >> v3: >> - Fix compilation issue on aarch64 (thanks to Andrew for testing it!) >> - Added Reviewed-bys >> >> v2: >> - Split up ucall.c into architecture specific files >> - Removed some #ifdef __s390x__ in the dirty_log patch >> >> Thomas Huth (3): >> KVM: selftests: Split ucall.c into architecture specific files >> KVM: selftests: Implement ucall() for s390x >> KVM: selftests: Enable dirty_log_test on s390x >> >> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 9 +- >> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c | 61 ++++++- >> .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 8 +- >> .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c | 112 +++++++++++++ >> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c | 56 +++++++ >> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall.c | 157 ------------------ >> .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c | 56 +++++++ >> .../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 6 +- >> 8 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c >> delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall.c >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c >> > > Paolo, I guess you do not mind if I carry patch 1 also via the s390x tree? Sure, Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> Paolo
