On 31.07.19 17:15, Thomas Huth wrote: > Implement the ucall() interface on s390x to be able to use the > dirty_log_test KVM selftest on s390x, too. > > v3: > - Fix compilation issue on aarch64 (thanks to Andrew for testing it!) > - Added Reviewed-bys > > v2: > - Split up ucall.c into architecture specific files > - Removed some #ifdef __s390x__ in the dirty_log patch > > Thomas Huth (3): > KVM: selftests: Split ucall.c into architecture specific files > KVM: selftests: Implement ucall() for s390x > KVM: selftests: Enable dirty_log_test on s390x > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 9 +- > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_test.c | 61 ++++++- > .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 8 +- > .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c | 112 +++++++++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c | 56 +++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall.c | 157 ------------------ > .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c | 56 +++++++ > .../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c | 6 +- > 8 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 178 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/ucall.c > delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/ucall.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/ucall.c > Paolo, I guess you do not mind if I carry patch 1 also via the s390x tree? Thanks, all applied
