On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:01:27 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> index 18dcc4d..7cc02ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> *
> * Author(s): Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> * Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + * Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *
> * Copyright IBM Corp. 2018
> */
> @@ -90,4 +91,14 @@ struct ap_matrix_mdev {
> extern int vfio_ap_mdev_register(void);
> extern void vfio_ap_mdev_unregister(void);
>
> +struct vfio_ap_queue {
> + struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev;
> + unsigned long a_nib;
> + unsigned long a_pfn;
> + unsigned long p_pfn;
> + int apqn;
> +#define VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID 0xff
How about -1?
> + unsigned char a_isc;
> + unsigned char p_isc;
> +};
> #endif /* _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_ */
I assume a_ and p_ are for argument and private, or? Anyway it would be
nice to have nicer names for these.
If the a_ members are really just arguments, we could probably live
without the. I'm fine either way.
Regards,
Halil
