On 19/03/2019 18:07, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 19/03/2019 15:54, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:01:44 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15/03/2019 18:28, Halil Pasic wrote:
...snip...
We should also do it right for TAPQ with t bit set. I remember
Christian already warned about this but we did not implement it.
Yes, I have some blurry memories of something similar myself. I wonder
if there was a reason, or did we just forget to address this issue.
I will integrate it in the next iteration too, even it is not IRQ, the
PQAP hook patch can be more general.
After all, I will not do this, I remember the reason why we did not do
it once: simply it is not intercepted until we enable it.
So we will handle it when we enable the TAPQ-t interception
Regards,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany
