Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] s390: vfio_ap: link the vfio_ap devices to the vfio_ap bus subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/21/19 9:14 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
Libudev relies on having a subsystem link for non-root devices. To
avoid libudev (and potentially other userspace tools) choking on the
matrix device let us introduce a matrix bus and with it the matrix
bus subsytem. Also make the matrix device reside within the matrix
bus.

Doing this we remove the forced link from the matrix device to the
vfio_ap driver and the device_type we do not need anymore.

Since the associated matrix driver is not the vfio_ap driver any more,
we have to change the search for the devices on the vfio_ap driver in
the function vfio_ap_verify_queue_reserved.

Fixes: 1fde573413b5 ("s390: vfio-ap: base implementation of VFIO AP device driver")

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c     | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c     |  4 ++--
  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h |  1 +
  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
index 31c6c84..e9824c3 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
  #include "vfio_ap_private.h"
#define VFIO_AP_ROOT_NAME "vfio_ap"
-#define VFIO_AP_DEV_TYPE_NAME "ap_matrix"
  #define VFIO_AP_DEV_NAME "matrix"
MODULE_AUTHOR("IBM Corporation");
@@ -24,10 +23,6 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
static struct ap_driver vfio_ap_drv; -static struct device_type vfio_ap_dev_type = {
-	.name = VFIO_AP_DEV_TYPE_NAME,
-};
-
  struct ap_matrix_dev *matrix_dev;
/* Only type 10 adapters (CEX4 and later) are supported
@@ -62,6 +57,22 @@ static void vfio_ap_matrix_dev_release(struct device *dev)
  	kfree(matrix_dev);
  }
+static int matrix_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static struct bus_type matrix_bus = {
+	.name = "matrix",

I'm sorry, I'm late to the game due to being in a time zone six hours
behind you all, but my preference would be 'ap_matrix' for the name
of the bus. It seems odd to have the bus and the device both named
'matrix'. It's just my opinion and not a show stopper.

+	.match = &matrix_bus_match,
+};
+
+static struct device_driver matrix_driver = {
+	.name = "vfio_ap",
+	.bus = &matrix_bus,
+	.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
+};
+
  static int vfio_ap_matrix_dev_create(void)
  {
  	int ret;
@@ -71,6 +82,10 @@ static int vfio_ap_matrix_dev_create(void)
  	if (IS_ERR(root_device))
  		return PTR_ERR(root_device);
+ ret = bus_register(&matrix_bus);
+	if (ret)
+		goto bus_register_err;
+
  	matrix_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*matrix_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (!matrix_dev) {
  		ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -87,30 +102,41 @@ static int vfio_ap_matrix_dev_create(void)
  	mutex_init(&matrix_dev->lock);
  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&matrix_dev->mdev_list);
- matrix_dev->device.type = &vfio_ap_dev_type;
  	dev_set_name(&matrix_dev->device, "%s", VFIO_AP_DEV_NAME);
  	matrix_dev->device.parent = root_device;
+	matrix_dev->device.bus = &matrix_bus;
  	matrix_dev->device.release = vfio_ap_matrix_dev_release;
-	matrix_dev->device.driver = &vfio_ap_drv.driver;
+	matrix_dev->vfio_ap_drv = &vfio_ap_drv;
ret = device_register(&matrix_dev->device);
  	if (ret)
  		goto matrix_reg_err;
+ ret = driver_register(&matrix_driver);
+	if (ret)
+		goto matrix_drv_err;
+
  	return 0;
+matrix_drv_err:
+	device_unregister(&matrix_dev->device);
  matrix_reg_err:
  	put_device(&matrix_dev->device);
  matrix_alloc_err:
+	bus_unregister(&matrix_bus);
+bus_register_err:
  	root_device_unregister(root_device);
-
  	return ret;
  }
static void vfio_ap_matrix_dev_destroy(void)
  {
+	struct device *root_device = matrix_dev->device.parent;
+
+	driver_unregister(&matrix_driver);
  	device_unregister(&matrix_dev->device);
-	root_device_unregister(matrix_dev->device.parent);
+	bus_unregister(&matrix_bus);
+	root_device_unregister(root_device);
  }
static int __init vfio_ap_init(void)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
index 272ef42..900b9cf 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
@@ -198,8 +198,8 @@ static int vfio_ap_verify_queue_reserved(unsigned long *apid,
  	qres.apqi = apqi;
  	qres.reserved = false;
- ret = driver_for_each_device(matrix_dev->device.driver, NULL, &qres,
-				     vfio_ap_has_queue);
+	ret = driver_for_each_device(&matrix_dev->vfio_ap_drv->driver, NULL,
+				     &qres, vfio_ap_has_queue);
  	if (ret)
  		return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
index 5675492..76b7f98 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct ap_matrix_dev {
  	struct ap_config_info info;
  	struct list_head mdev_list;
  	struct mutex lock;
+	struct ap_driver  *vfio_ap_drv;
  };
extern struct ap_matrix_dev *matrix_dev;





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux