Re: [PATCH v6 05/13] KVM: s390: use pending_irqs_no_gisa() where appropriate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:59:31 +0100
Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Interruption types that are not represented in GISA shall
> use pending_irqs_no_gisa() to test pending interruptions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I guess this is just a tiny optimization.

Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index 005dbe7252e7..cb48736867ed 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static void set_intercept_indicators_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  static void set_intercept_indicators_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	if (!(pending_irqs(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_EXT_MASK))
> +	if (!(pending_irqs_no_gisa(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_EXT_MASK))
>  		return;
>  	if (psw_extint_disabled(vcpu))
>  		kvm_s390_set_cpuflags(vcpu, CPUSTAT_EXT_INT);
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void set_intercept_indicators_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  static void set_intercept_indicators_mchk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	if (!(pending_irqs(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_MCHK_MASK))
> +	if (!(pending_irqs_no_gisa(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_MCHK_MASK))
>  		return;
>  	if (psw_mchk_disabled(vcpu))
>  		vcpu->arch.sie_block->ictl |= ICTL_LPSW;




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux