Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] vfio-ccw: add capabilities chain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:00:18 -0500
Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 01/25/2019 11:19 AM, Eric Farman wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 01/21/2019 06:03 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:  
> >> Allow to extend the regions used by vfio-ccw. The first user will be
> >> handling of halt and clear subchannel.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c     | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >>   drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h |  38 ++++++  
> ...snip...
> >> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h 
> >> b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
> >> index e88237697f83..20e75f4f3695 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
> >> @@ -3,9 +3,11 @@
> >>    * Private stuff for vfio_ccw driver
> >>    *
> >>    * Copyright IBM Corp. 2017
> >> + * Copyright Red Hat, Inc. 2019
> >>    *
> >>    * Author(s): Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>    *            Xiao Feng Ren <renxiaof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> + *            Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>    */
> >>   #ifndef _VFIO_CCW_PRIVATE_H_
> >> @@ -19,6 +21,38 @@
> >>   #include "css.h"
> >>   #include "vfio_ccw_cp.h"
> >> +#define VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_SHIFT   40
> >> +#define VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(off)    (off >> VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_SHIFT)
> >> +#define VFIO_CCW_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(index)    ((u64)(index) << 
> >> VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_SHIFT)
> >> +#define VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_MASK    (((u64)(1) << VFIO_CCW_OFFSET_SHIFT) 
> >> - 1)
> >> +
> >> +/* capability chain handling similar to vfio-pci */
> >> +struct vfio_ccw_private;
> >> +struct vfio_ccw_region;
> >> +
> >> +struct vfio_ccw_regops {
> >> +    size_t    (*read)(struct vfio_ccw_private *private, char __user 
> >> *buf,
> >> +            size_t count, loff_t *ppos);
> >> +    size_t    (*write)(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
> >> +             const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos);  
> 
> Oops.  Per my recommendation on v1, you change these to "ssize_t" in 
> patch 5.  Might as well just do that here.

Seems to have slipped into the wrong patch during rebase. Will fix.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux