Re: [PATCH v7 09/22] s390: vfio-ap: register matrix device with VFIO mdev framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 21:54:16 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Registers the matrix device created by the VFIO AP device
> driver with the VFIO mediated device framework.
> Registering the matrix device will create the sysfs
> structures needed to create mediated matrix devices
> each of which will be used to configure the AP matrix
> for a guest and connect it to the VFIO AP device driver.
> 
> Registering the matrix device with the VFIO mediated device
> framework will create the following sysfs structures:
> 
> /sys/devices/vfio_ap

I think you need to update this to point to the new location.

> ... [matrix]
> ...... [mdev_supported_types]
> ......... [vfio_ap-passthrough]
> ............ create
> 
> To create a mediated device for the AP matrix device, write a UUID
> to the create file:
> 
> 	uuidgen > create
> 
> A symbolic link to the mediated device's directory will be created in the
> devices subdirectory named after the generated $uuid:
> 
> /sys/devices/vfio_ap
> ... [matrix]
> ...... [mdev_supported_types]
> ......... [vfio_ap-passthrough]
> ............ [devices]
> ............... [$uuid]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                           |   1 +
>  drivers/s390/crypto/Makefile          |   2 +-
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c     |  27 +++++-
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c     | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h |  46 ++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> 

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> index ff2b05d2aef1..25636e6bf893 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <asm/zcrypt.h>
>  #include "vfio_ap_private.h"
>  
>  #define VFIO_AP_ROOT_NAME "vfio_ap"
> @@ -33,7 +34,7 @@ struct ap_matrix_dev matrix_dev = {
>  	.misc_dev = {
>  		MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
>  		VFIO_AP_DEV_NAME,
> -	}
> +	},

Should go into previous patch?

>  };
>  
>  /* Only type 10 adapters (CEX4 and later) are supported
> @@ -65,6 +66,21 @@ static int vfio_ap_matrix_dev_create(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	mutex_init(&matrix_dev.lock);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&matrix_dev.mdev_list);
> +
> +	/* Test if PQAP(QCI) instruction is available */
> +	if (test_facility(12)) {
> +		ret = ap_qci(&matrix_dev.info);
> +		if (ret && (ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)) {

So, is facility 12 a pre-req for PQAP(QCI)? Can the code work if
matrix_dev.info is not populated?

> +			vfio_ap_mdev_unregister();
> +
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	atomic_set(&matrix_dev.available_instances, MAX_ZDEV_ENTRIES_EXT);
> +
>  	ret = misc_register(&matrix_dev.misc_dev);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -99,11 +115,20 @@ int __init vfio_ap_init(void)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	ret = vfio_ap_mdev_register();
> +	if (ret) {
> +		ap_driver_unregister(&vfio_ap_drv);
> +		vfio_ap_matrix_dev_destroy();
> +
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  void __exit vfio_ap_exit(void)
>  {
> +	vfio_ap_mdev_unregister();
>  	ap_driver_unregister(&vfio_ap_drv);
>  	vfio_ap_matrix_dev_destroy();
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e4e8d738a043
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Adjunct processor matrix VFIO device driver callbacks.
> + *
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2018
> + */
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/vfio.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/ctype.h>
> +
> +#include "vfio_ap_private.h"
> +
> +#define VFOP_AP_MDEV_TYPE_HWVIRT "passthrough"

typo       ^^^^

> +#define VFIO_AP_MDEV_NAME_HWVIRT "VFIO AP Passthrough Device"

(...)

> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> index 02c878cbd011..c2fd4a3e0ae3 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/mdev.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>  
>  #include "ap_bus.h"
>  
> @@ -18,13 +22,55 @@
>  
>  struct ap_matrix_dev {
>  	struct miscdevice misc_dev;
> +	atomic_t available_instances;
> +	struct ap_config_info info;
> +	struct list_head mdev_list;
> +	struct mutex lock;
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * Lockin strategy: take the matix_dev.lock mutex each time we fiddle

s/Lockin/Locking/

> + * with state managed by the vfio_ap driver (be it using the
> + * mdev_list or be it readin or writing the state of a single

s/readin/reading/

> + * ap_matrix_mdev device). It's quite coarse but we don't expect
> + * much contention.
> + */
>  extern struct ap_matrix_dev matrix_dev;
>  
> +/**
> + * The AP matrix is comprised of three bit masks identifying the adapters,
> + * queues (domains) and control domains that belong to an AP matrix. The bits i

s/i/in/

> + * each mask, from least significant to most significant bit, correspond to IDs
> + * 0 to 255. When a bit is set, the corresponding ID belongs to the matrix.
> + *
> + * @apm_max: max adapter number in @apm
> + * @apm identifies the AP adapters in the matrix
> + * @aqm_max: max domain number in @aqm
> + * @aqm identifies the AP queues (domains) in the matrix
> + * @adm_max: max domain number in @adm
> + * @adm identifies the AP control domains in the matrix
> + */
> +struct ap_matrix {
> +	unsigned long apm_max;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(apm, 256);
> +	unsigned long aqm_max;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(aqm, 256);
> +	unsigned long adm_max;
> +	DECLARE_BITMAP(adm, 256);
> +};
> +
> +struct ap_matrix_mdev {
> +	const char *name;
> +	struct list_head list;
> +	struct ap_matrix matrix;
> +};
> +
>  static inline struct device *to_device(struct ap_matrix_dev *matrix_dev)
>  {
>  	return matrix_dev->misc_dev.this_device;
>  }
>  
> +extern int vfio_ap_mdev_register(void);
> +extern void vfio_ap_mdev_unregister(void);
> +
>  #endif /* _VFIO_AP_PRIVATE_H_ */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux