On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:23 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > In addition to above, we have xen hvm: > > setup_arch() > ... > init_hypervisor_platform(); > x86_init.hyper.init_platform(); > xen_hvm_guest_init() > xen_hvm_init_time_ops(); Duh. Missed that completely. > ... > tsc_early_delay_calibrate(); > tsc_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc(); == xen_tsc_khz() > ... > > Which works early. > > So, what should we do with xen, which seems to be the only platform > that would provide different tsc frequency early and late, because of > different calibration method? Fix it? I have no idea why XEN has two variants of the scheme and I neither have a clue why the KVM clock stuff is late. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html