Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: replace __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/04/2018 22:08, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
>>> -#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
>>>  # define HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL 1
>>>  #else
>>>  # define HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL 0
>>
>> I'd say kill this odd indirection and just use the
>> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL symbol directly.
>>
>>
> 
> Agree, and I think it would be easier to audit/review if patches 1 and 3 
> were folded together to see the relationship between the newly added 
> selects and what #define's it is replacing.  Otherwise, looks good!
>

Ok I will fold the 3 patches and introduce a new one removing HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL.

Thanks,
Laurent.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux