Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: replace __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> > -#ifdef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
> >  # define HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL 1
> >  #else
> >  # define HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL 0
> 
> I'd say kill this odd indirection and just use the
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL symbol directly.
> 
> 

Agree, and I think it would be easier to audit/review if patches 1 and 3 
were folded together to see the relationship between the newly added 
selects and what #define's it is replacing.  Otherwise, looks good!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux