On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 10:22:32 -0500
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Because we do not make use of the cda (channel data address) for test,
> no-op ccws no address translation takes place. This means cda could
> contain a guest address which we do not want to attempt to free. Let's
> check the command type and skip cda free when it is not needed.
>
> For a TIC ccw, ccw->cda points to either a ccw in an existing chain or
> it points to a whole new allocated chain. In either case the data will
> be freed when the owning chain is freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> index 5ccfdc8..325a9f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> @@ -329,6 +329,8 @@ static void ccwchain_cda_free(struct ccwchain *chain, int idx)
> {
> struct ccw1 *ccw = chain->ch_ccw + idx;
>
> + if (ccw_is_test(ccw) || ccw_is_noop(ccw) || ccw_is_tic(ccw))
> + return;
> if (!ccw->count)
> return;
>
Thanks, applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
