Am Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:48:24 +0100
schrieb Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> After we already allocated the jit.prg_buf image via
> bpf_jit_binary_alloc() and filled it out with instructions,
> jit.prg_buf cannot be NULL anymore. Thus, remove the
> unnecessary check. Tested on s390x with test_bpf module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 167b31b..b4272cd 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -1331,14 +1331,12 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp)
> }
> if (bpf_jit_enable > 1) {
> bpf_jit_dump(fp->len, jit.size, pass, jit.prg_buf);
> - if (jit.prg_buf)
> - print_fn_code(jit.prg_buf, jit.size_prg);
> - }
> - if (jit.prg_buf) {
> - set_memory_ro((unsigned long)header, header->pages);
> - fp->bpf_func = (void *) jit.prg_buf;
> - fp->jited = 1;
> + print_fn_code(jit.prg_buf, jit.size_prg);
> }
> +
> + set_memory_ro((unsigned long)header, header->pages);
> + fp->bpf_func = (void *) jit.prg_buf;
> + fp->jited = 1;
> free_addrs:
> kfree(jit.addrs);
> out:
Makes sense, thanks!
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
