On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 10:14:11 -0800 Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 15:29:23 +0100 > > Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I'm currently suspecting some endianness issues, probably with the ecw > >> accesses, which is why I'd be interested in your trace information (as > >> I currently don't have a LE test setup at hand.) > > > > I think I've got it. We have sense_data as a byte array, which > > implicitly makes it BE already. When we copy to the ecws while building > > the irb, the data ends up in 32 bit values. The conversion from host > > endianness to BE now treats them as LE on your system... > > > > Could you please give the following qemu patch a try? > > Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Now my test script panics for the right reason (init isn't actually an > s390 binary). Thanks! Cool, thanks for testing! I'll get this into qemu as a proper patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
