On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 15:29:23 +0100 > Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I'm currently suspecting some endianness issues, probably with the ecw >> accesses, which is why I'd be interested in your trace information (as >> I currently don't have a LE test setup at hand.) > > I think I've got it. We have sense_data as a byte array, which > implicitly makes it BE already. When we copy to the ecws while building > the irb, the data ends up in 32 bit values. The conversion from host > endianness to BE now treats them as LE on your system... > > Could you please give the following qemu patch a try? Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> Now my test script panics for the right reason (init isn't actually an s390 binary). Thanks! I'll update my branch with the latest s390 DMA stuff, and now I can give it at least basic regression testing. Of course, I have to find a root filesystem, too. :) --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
