On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 07:24:58PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > > > > > > This is a trivial port from kGraft. Module relocations are not > > > > supported. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > [v2] return ENOSYS > > > > [v3] proper return value from klp_check_compiler_support > > > > > > Applied to for-4.1/core. > > > > Hello Jiri, > > > > while I do appreciate your work on the s390 architecture backend for > > livepatching: this should go upstream only via the s390 tree or with > > an Ack from Martin or me. > > Fair enough; I merged it because I was convinced that we have your Ack for > the very same patch in our tree for kGraft, but now that I look again, we > apparently don't. So sorry for that. What is your standpoint on this one > then, please? I thought there was more available then the simple testcase within the kernel. But since the testcase works: Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
