On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:14:00PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Stelian Nirlu <steliannirlu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Stelian Nirlu <steliannirlu@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c > > index 0972e91..e645528 100644 > > --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c > > +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c > > @@ -747,10 +747,9 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) > > > > if (!bpf_jit_enable) > > return; > > - addrs = kmalloc(fp->len * sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL); > > + addrs = kzalloc(fp->len * sizeof(*addrs), GFP_KERNEL); > > kcalloc() might be more appropriate here to protect against integer > overflow if "fp->len" is too large. Stelian, care to send an updated patch which uses kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
